Sukhoi Civil Aircraft (SCAC) managed to fly the fourth prototype of the
Superjet 100 this month, no thanks to Russian engine maker NPO Saturn, which partners with Snecma in building the Superjetâs Powerjet engines. Clearly feeling desperate after the Saturn-Snecma partnership failed to deliver the programâs seventh and eighth
Powerjet SaM146 turbofans in due course, Sukhoi removed the engines from the first prototype and installed them on the fourth, simply to get the airplane airborne, in time perhaps to gain Russian certification by July. Meanwhile, a lack of ready production airplanes likely means launch customers Aeroflot and Armavia wonât receive their first examples until late this year.
Plagued last year by near financial collapse, an exodus of more than 200 engineers, quality-control inadequacies and a change in ownership structure, Saturn not only failed in its commitment to Sukhoi, it also might have validated skepticism over the wisdom of Snecmaâs partnership with the Russian company. Snecma, which is controlled by Franceâs Safran Group, agreed to build the high-pressure side of the engine and ceded responsibility to Saturn for the low-pressure side and final assembly in Russia. But rather than result in an equal partnership, the deal has seen Safran send a team of engineers to Saturnâs assembly facility in Rybinsk to help Saturn work through its quality âissues.â The partnership has also reallocated production of certain low-pressure componentsâmost notably fan bladesâto French suppliers.
Alas, Powerjetâone of the earliest examples of aerospace collaboration between Western Europe and the former Soviet Blocâmight well serve as a cautionary tale for other companies. Happily for Safran, Sukhoi and the marketing joint venture between Italyâs Alenia and SCAC known as Superjet International, the Russian government has intervened with monetary support for Saturnâbut not in time to save the program from another year-long delay and perhaps a loss of credibility that will require more than money to recover.