Slow Progress Forces Rethink of UAS Standards Committee

AINonline
March 28, 2013, 2:25 PM

The U.S. industry and government committee that was formed to define performance standards enabling unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to fly in unrestricted airspace will break into separate groups focused on component aspects of UAS because of concern over the committee’s slow progress.

RTCA Special Committee 203 (SC-203) was established in October 2004 to define minimum aviation system performance standards (Masps) for UAS that the Federal Aviation Administration would then use in developing its guidance to industry in the form of technical standard orders for equipment and advisory circulars for methods and procedures.

In a presentation to the Oklahoma UAS summit in Norman, Okla., on March 26, Carl Mikeman, president of the UAS National Industry Team (Unite), said SC-203 will be reformed to focus on the “sense-and-avoid” and control and communications aspects of unmanned aircraft. Unite represents major U.S. manufacturers of UAS. Mikeman also leads Northrop Grumman’s UAS airspace access team.

He described SC-203 as a “large organization” that makes decisions based on a consensus of its members. “Progress is painfully slow,” Mikeman said. “In fact, we just learned that SC-203 after seven or eight years is being dissolved and reformed as a group of special committees to address individual elements of unmanned aircraft flight: sense-and-avoid and efficient communications” with the ground.

RTCA president Margaret Jenny discussed the pending change at a plenary meeting of SC-203 on February 12. According to the meeting minutes, Jenny explained that the committee’s focus on developing Masps is “complex work based on the scope of the (committee’s) existing terms of reference. Ms. Jenny went on to say that there are some stakeholders, specifically the Department of Defense, who are concerned that product development is not happening fast enough.”

Jenny said an ad-hoc committee had been formed to review SC-203’s terms of reference “to determine how to potentially expedite its work.” The members of the ad-hoc committee include Jim Williams, head of the FAA’s UAS integration office and other FAA executives; U.S. Air Force Col. Juan Narvid; and representatives of UAS manufacturers Boeing and General Atomics, among others. “Ms. Jenny stressed that the Ad Hoc Committee does not want to lose the work that has been done to date in SC-203, and all current members will have an opportunity to stay involved, whatever the outcome,” the minutes state.

Williams also spoke at the plenary meeting. He said his organization within the FAA initiated a review of the SC-203 terms of reference last year to determine “how to more effectively refocus the group’s products based on needed standards,” according to the minutes. He noted the importance of ensuring that standards the Air Force is developing for airborne sense-and-avoid capability are compatible with the National Airspace System (NAS).

At his presentation in Oklahoma, Mikeman said that the congressional mandate to introduce unmanned aircraft in the NAS by 2015 “has been interpreted by the FAA as being small (UAS) systems only.” The agency has made that distinction for a number of reasons, “one of which is that the large-system issue, those (UAS) that fly above 400 feet, is a whole bigger problem. Secondly, there are not a lot of systems that size that are ready to be certified.”

FILED UNDER: 
Share this...

Comments

No Avatar
John Smith
on March 30, 2013 - 1:01pm

Why don't we just mandate that all human carrying aircraft fly above 5000 feet and everything else fly below unless properly authorized until someone or some group (FAA) gets their "Stuff" in one sock....This has become a world wide joke...Every other country on the planet is so much further ahead of the USA in this area or regard because of all the hidden agendas of the "Big Boys" and FAA cronies as far as it appears from the outside looking in. How can it be that the supposed most advanced society is the furthest behind on something like this? If UAS / UAV's were just out in the last couple years it would make sense for this process to be where it currently is, but after 10-15 years of these things in existence....Come-on....

Please Register

In order to leave comments you will now need to be a registered user. This change in policy is to protect our site from an increased number of spam comments. Additionally, in the near future you will be able to better manage your AIN subscriptions via this registration system. If you already have an account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register.

 
X