Port Authority Example Not an EMAS Save

AINalerts » April 5, 2007
April 5, 2007, 12:48 PM

In its announcement last week that more ESCO Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS) beds have been authorized for installation at Kennedy, Newark and Teterboro Airports, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey declared that the EMAS already in place for Runway 6 at Teterboro had “safely stopped” one aircraft overrun a week after it was installed. That’s not accurate. Rather, in the Oct. 25, 2006 incident to which the Port Authority refers, a Challenger registered to Bank of America and operated by VoltronAir of St. Louis taxied accidentally into the EMAS after landing at night. Contrary to the Port Authority’s implication, the aircraft did not overrun the runway during its landing. Meanwhile, the Port Authority has authorized an EMAS for Teterboro Runway 19. A Port Authority spokesman said an installation timetable had not been set.

FILED UNDER: 
Share this...

Please Register

In order to leave comments you will now need to be a registered user. This change in policy is to protect our site from an increased number of spam comments. Additionally, in the near future you will be able to better manage your AIN subscriptions via this registration system. If you already have an account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register.

 
X